Hello I writing to request if you can add support for the Sui block chain. Sui is the 15th largest crypto token by market cap and will likely finish this cycle in the top 10 if the trend continues (I may have doomed that by my prediction). Give it’s size and importance please can you consider adding it as this would greatly benefit Trezor users who want to stay on Trezor. Thank you
Hello, are there any plans to integrate Arbitrum blockchain into Trezor Suite? I’d love it if you did so that I wouldn’t have to rely on MetaMask.
Hello, wanted to ask if there are any plans on supporting Algorand on the “Safe 3” in the future?
1 Like
I have a rather serious (and frustratingly long-standing) dilemma when it comes to Trezor.
On the one hand, I’d genuinely love to support the guys at Trezor (jsou to fakt řízci 
, co vybudovali za ty roky, klobouček 
) and finally add one variant of their amazing Trezor devices to my personal collection. (I’ve always been a huge supporter of pioneers in any field - people who don’t just talk big but actually get things done, dare to dream big, and aren’t easily intimidated by challenges. 
)
Unfortunately, the years keep flying by, and I still can’t bring myself to buy one. :-/
My problem is exactly the same as the one mentioned by the user above: the long-standing, practically nonexistent support for the Algorand blockchain, which is an absolute must-have for me and several of my colleagues at work.
I know, I know… I do have a bit of skin in the game, since I’m involved as one of the contributing developers. BUT, I’ll be completely transparent about that. And yes, I’m perfectly aware that ALGO hasn’t exactly had the greatest run in terms of market capitalization over the past years.
However, as an engineer, I’m not particularly interested in price movements themselves. What matters much more to me are the underlying technical fundamentals and what a particular technology actually brings to the table.
So anyone who has taken a serious, in-depth look at Algorand recently will have to admit that its technical foundation is, to put it rather modestly, extremely solid.
We’ve also recently begun laying the groundwork for the first of a broader series of improvements aimed at protection against quantum threats - something that’s getting closer with every passing year. We live in an incredibly fast-moving and turbulent world, after all, so it’s essential to keep thinking a hundred steps ahead rather than sitting around waiting for problems to arrive.
And then there’s the part that even less technically inclined users can appreciate: improved security, massive throughput directly on Layer 1, and transactions that are not only fast but, most importantly, extremely inexpensive. 
Personally, I’m not a huge fan of the seemingly endless layers being built on top of Ethereum, simply because they tend to confuse newcomers enormously. That said, I absolutely understand and appreciate why Ethereum needed a fast, functional scaling solution back then. Those of us who’ve been around long enough certainly remember some of the major crises and growing pains of the crypto world - quite literally the definition of suffering from success 
, unfortunately.
Based on the benchmark tests we’ve been running, combined with the improvements we’re currently developing for future updates, I’d go so far as to say that even if a massive wave of new projects suddenly flooded into the Algorand ecosystem, Layer 1 alone would be perfectly capable of handling the load without breaking a sweat.
And all of that while maintaining the same predictable transaction fees.
There’s still considerable technical headroom for further scaling, without having to sacrifice decentralization, security, or the other fundamental principles that matter so much in blockchain architecture.
Anyway, I’ve gotten a little carried away here, so I’ll wrap it up. My apologies for the lengthy post! 
I also don’t want to derail the original topic of this thread. However, since there hasn’t been much new discussion here for quite some time, I figured I’d write something a little more substantial: especially since this particular request is coming from someone who happens to have a somewhat more profound insight into the blockchain in question.
More importantly, I wanted to remind everyone that even after all these years, the demand for Algorand support on Trezor is very much alive.
Presently, quite a few people at my workplace who don’t rely exclusively on software wallet solutions are effectively forced to use a competing hardware wallet instead. Which is a pity, but it is what it is right now. 
I’d absolutely love to kick off a little revolution and gradually change that situation, especially since I also have some influence over which hardware we purchase.
Well, I suppose the real question now is: will I reach retirement age before Trezor finally handles Algorand ecosystem support? Or will it be precisely the opposite? NGL, I’m rly curious- both are possible. 
I’ll certainly keep watching closely, and we’ll see what the future brings. 
P.S. And if it ultimately never happens, well, so be it. Regardless, I sincerely wish the Trezor team continued success in everything they do. 
Anyway, as I mentioned earlier, I have enormous respect for ambitious ventures built around genuinely good ideas, great products, confidence, and (most importantly) the determination to actually make things happen. And seeing a company from our relatively small country dare to think globally and succeed on the international stage? That’s something I’ll always admire and wholeheartedly support.
Hats off to you guys , and keep up the great work! 